The Once For All Sacrifice Of Christ 3-22-26 PM

I. The inadequacy of animal sacrifices (Hebrew 10:1-6).

a. Our writer starts this section off by telling us that the law only contained a shadow of the good things to come from God.

i. A shadow is the form without substance.

ii. In fact, our writer then says the law did not contain the very image, Greek word icon, of those good things.

b. This was one of the purposes of the old law, to show the form of what was to come in Christ.

c. Because the law did not contain the substance of those good things, it was impossible for it and the sacrifices made along with it to ever make the followers of it perfect.

i. Notice Hebrews 7:19.

ii. This gives us an idea of what perfect or perfection means in Hebrews.

iii. It is the ability to draw near to God.

d. Those sacrifices under the old law, though demanded, still did not allow the one offering the sacrifice access to God; you still had to go through the high priest.

e. If they could have, as verse 2 points out, then they would not have needed to be continually offered.

i. There was no purging or cleansing from sin under the old law.

ii. Instead, there was a remembrance of sin every time that a sacrifice was made.

f. The reason for this is that it is impossible for animal blood to take away sins.

g. The writer then does something interesting by quoting from Psalm 40:6-8.

h. We will get deeper into this in the next point but something needs to be brought out here that goes along with the inadequacy of the animal sacrifices.

i. Notice that it tells us that God does not want sacrifice and offering and that burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin give God no pleasure.

ii. The animal sacrifices did not bring pleasure to God for this reason: the offerings were a reminder of sin and God hates sin and many of the offerings were made out of ritualistic habit and not love for God.

i. Do you remember what Samuel told Saul, recorded in 1 Samuel 15:22?

j. Remember what David wrote in the penitential Psalm 51:16?

k. God wanted love out of a pure heart and the sacrificial system had devolved into ritualism and all external actions with no change in the hearts of most who offered them.

l. So the animal sacrifices were inadequate because they couldn’t bring full access to God, the couldn’t remove sin, and they couldn’t change the heart of those that came to offer them.

II.‍ ‍The dedication of Christ (Hebrews 10:5-10).

a. Since the animal sacrifices were completely inadequate to remove sin, there had to be a sacrifice made that could.

b. Animal blood was not powerful enough to do it, so it had to be the blood of a human like us, the ones who needed the sacrifice.

c. Hopefully we understand that the sacrifice needed was not a mere human because we are sinful and in need of a sacrifice.

d. It had to be a perfect man and there are none here on earth.

e. For that reason, Jesus, the 2nd Person of the Godhead, became our offering.

i. It took great dedication on His part to become our offering.

ii. It involved giving up His equality with the Father and becoming like us and that took dedication.

f. We mentioned that the writer was inspired to take a quotation from Psalm 40:6-8.

i. If you read the Psalm, for this to be said strictly about David does not make sense.

ii. The entire Psalm is not a look to the Messiah because of verse 12 (Psalm 40:12).

iii. The Psalm overall, is about the trials of life and the need to depend on God’s guidance through those trials.

iv. You see, where David, really all of us, failed in following God, Jesus succeeded.

v. Those things for which David, and us, strive for with God, Jesus achieved.

g. Notice that Jesus is saying that God prepared Him a body.

i. In the original Hebrew of the Psalm, it literally says, “Mine ear thou hast digged”.

ii. The idea is that the body was made by God, showing the Virgin birth - no man was needed, only a womb to bring it into existence because God formed it.

iii. Also, by using the ear in the original, it shows the willingness to hear God’s commands on the part of the One formed.

‍ ‍ iv. Jesus was going to hear and heed the commands of the One who formed Him.

h. God was pleased with Jesus, not the burnt offerings and sacrifices.

i. So, he says in verse 7, I come to do thy will O God.

j. Notice now the parenthetical phrase, “in the volume of the book it is written of me”.

i. The Jews had no excuse for not believing in Jesus as the Messiah because the whole Old Testament pointed to Him.

ii. As Jesus had taught the Jews, the Old Testament testified of Jesus throughout it.

k. Since God was not pleased with the offerings of the Old Testament for the reasons we mentioned, Jesus took those away and the law the taught them and brought in the second.

i. But notice how it is stated.

ii. The sacrifices and burnt offerings were not pleasing to God in verse 8.

iii. Jesus came to do God’s will in verse 9.

iv. This tells us that it was God’s will and intention for the first to be removed and the second to be established.

v. There was never a plan for the Old Testament law to continue.

l. It was God’s will to provide for the forgiveness of our sins, to be able to set us apart, our sanctification (vs 10).

m. This was accomplished by the sacrifice of the body of Jesus one time for all time.

n. Notice through all of this that Jesus was dedicated to doing the will of God which culminated in His offering Himself for our sins one time for all time.

III.‍ ‍The ability of Christ’s sacrifice (Hebrews 10:11-18).

a. The writer goes back to the imagery of the old sacrificial system.

i. He points out that those priests continually stood offering the same sacrifices.

ii. The way its written shows the continual offering of the same sacrifices over and over again.

iii. Think about the offerings that were made: every day there were two bulls offered, every new moon their were offerings, every feast had certain offerings, and every time someone sinned there was to be an offering.

iv. All those offerings and the writer tells us that they never took away the first sin.

v. Instead, the high priest was always standing and offering.

b. He then points out that Jesus made one offering for sins forever and is now sitting at God’s right hand.

i. He is such a better High Priest because He offered a better sacrifice: Himself.

ii. This showed He completed the will of God when it came to the need for a sacrifice.

iii. This showed that Jesus was victorious over sin and death and will reign till those two are gone.

iv. Jesus destroyed the power of them with His offering and one day, when He returns, they will be gone forever.

c. Jesus, according to verse 14, only had to make one offering to give us access to God.

d. The writer now quotes again from Jeremiah 31:31-34.

i. This shows again that God never intended for the old law to remain in force.

ii. He doesn’t quote all of it, only that part having to do with forgiveness.

iii. The new law would provide forgiveness and redemption and the forgetting of sin, not a reminder of it.

e. He closes this section letting his readers know that since there is remission of sins, there is no longer a need for an offering for sin.

‍ ‍ i. The need was taken care of by Christ.

‍ ‍ii. The one time offering of Himself is good for all time when it comes to the providing of the forgiveness of sins.